Crew read

scanned 10d ago
No coordination signals found

Nothing here rises to naming this wallet. One weak tell is a coincidence — it takes a hard signal, or two softer ones, before we say anything.

Identity

attributed by Arkham
"ezbef2" on Pump.fun

A labelled SERVICE — exchange, bridge, market maker — is deliberately kept OUT of the coordination graph: it funds and trades with thousands of unrelated wallets, so an edge through it would link everyone to everyone. Malicious labels are kept in, because those are what we are hunting.

Behaviour

from 36 recent swaps
avg hold
4m
round trips
26
tokens traded
6
still holding
3
positions open at the window's end (swaps, not a live balance)

scalper — paper hands

Every flag carries the exact transactions it is based on. A label nobody can check is an accusation, not a finding.

Wallet age

from its signature history
first activity
2026-07-31
AT THE EARLIEST
last activity
2026-08-05
transactions
4,000+
capped — busier than we walked
SOL balance
519.77

The history walk hit its cap, so that date is the OLDEST TRANSACTION WE REACHED — not the wallet's age. A wallet doing thousands of transactions a day fills the whole window in a single day, which makes a years-old bot look like it was created this morning. Read it as “at least this active since”.

Funding

First funding not resolved yet.

First funding never changes, so this is cached permanently. A funder that is a recognised exchange is stored but never treated as a link — Binance funds a million unrelated wallets.

Bought the same tokens

overlap ≠ coordination — a flagged peer is the signal

Connection check

Moved early on

real SOL, before the crowd